
24-hours of breaking news
Usually, little ol’ bloggers like myself would think that taking on someone with many more advanced degrees and status in the real world would be a bad idea. I, on the other hand, have no qualms about doing just that.
Recently, the news that Canadian singer/songwriter Gordon Lightfoot was dead went viral. Thankfully it turned out to be a hoax. A hoax perpetrated by the social media and news outlets that we all have grown accustomed to. Abby Goodrum, the Velma Rogers Graham Research Chair in News, Media and Technology at Ryerson University’s School of Journalism, argued in an article published in The Mark News said this,
“The Lightfoot example has less to do with the old media’s inability to harness new media and social networking technology than it has to do with the old media’s failure to do what we expect them to do: check facts; seek multiple sources for verification; filter through the noise and misinformation; get to the bottom of a story and get it right, no matter what a phone prankster posing as an authority and the mob on Twitter say.”
I fundamentally disagree with her. For anyone who watched Global News Toronto that night at 11pm would have heard from Leslie Roberts that Global in fact did check with multiple sources, all of which confirmed the news that Gordon Lightfoot had passed. The sources themselves turned out to be wrong. Therefore, Global News, did what they are expected to; check sources and reported what they knew. They also admitted that they had made a mistake and corrected the information when they learned, from checking sources, that they had been incorrect.
Now this isn’t to say that old media did everything right. Of course they didn’t, if they had, they would have known that Gordon Lightfoot was in fact alive and well. The problem though, is not the internet and the fact that bad news travels quickly, but the problem is that the audience is expecting information quickly and old media has given into that expectation by presenting news expediently rather than accurately.
Not only has old media, i.e. television, given into the expectation of presenting news quickly; they created the expectation. The onset of the 24-hour news channel provided viewers with news whenever they wanted it. The side effect of this was that watching television still had to be entertaining. Therefore the news had to have something important (and thus entertaining) to report, whatever it happens to be. News has transformed from being important facts affecting everyone (politics, business, etc) to how to lose weight, dress better, or be happier. News has simply become a story told to fill time; the details of the story are expendable.
Aside: As usual, The Onion New Network has perfectly presented the absurdity of the 24-hour news channel.
Breaking News: Some Bullshit Happening Somewhere
It is not the mob mentality of new media forcing journalists to make mistakes. It is 21st century, television journalism that is begrudging standards and chipping away at professionalism.
~James
Recent Comments